Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 simon.willnauer@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vmZSJKQ5gT/DY2Q4kzIUdZoB9ojYchaSAaGiLpJNdcz8L9tB64TLQOgzll0EMwJylR
         2OP7dtntqntUh29mW1pPDdrVSIinu0U2S/tnpUzmC0q5ZjagXo4kK+KIIr6Ub1c0eNRv
         Uo5iOW4tMOm0Mr2AYjO/oyXApze6JRVARJWfw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: simon.willnauer@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilQOPqrHT4HoNPlvPCx8ANP0X9Up8An-Tz08Exg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilzaf4NMUbp1zaiYLRFbPEMW_mBrBFdfz81uu4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikXdY73j5XOic8GsN_t5IU4sCWlt08zWDpm9lWF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilQOPqrHT4HoNPlvPCx8ANP0X9Up8An-Tz08Exg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 05:45:58 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimWZVZNkHIfFV0ojuao3nS2TgrIi9DcVIykJK8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar
From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@googlemail.com>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I personally don't really care if it is called dev or SNAPSHOT. If it
helps other people to integrate current trunk code more easily and in
turn use the latest code for development I think we should do it.
Maybe I miss something why this is super important to be called "-dev"
if so please let me know. If it only is about somebodies preference
they could use -Ddev.version=3D4.0-dev too.

simon

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
> ah yes, that would work... still not great for integrating with solr
> and keeping the versions in sync though. =C2=A0As a one-off just for me,
> that works fine, but I wonder more about getting snapshot builds as
> part of the hudson build scripts.
>
> perhaps 3.x, 4.x would be a good time to change some file names so
> they play nicer with maven (and does not really impact how things are
> currently done)
>
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Simon Willnauer
> <simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Can't you simply build it with ant -Ddev.version=3D4.0-SNAPSHOT
>> that should build a jar with the corresponding artifacts.
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> (hoping to avoid an anti-maven flame war)
>>>
>>> I'm looking at getting the ant tasks to play nice with maven again.
>>> In solr, there is a way to have the .jar files be "-dev.jar" but have
>>> the artifacts still map to -SNAPSHOT.jar.
>>>
>>> Getting the lucene ant scripts to do this is beyond my ant mojo, so it
>>> leads me to ask another question...
>>>
>>> How do people feel about renaming the lucene (and solr) dev .jar files
>>> from "-dev.jar" to "-SNAPSHOT.jar"?
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>> ryan
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org