lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <karl.wri...@nokia.com>
Subject RE: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar
Date Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:31:44 GMT
I don't understand the -dev requirement either, but for maven the jar suffix names do matter,
and that's where -SNAPSHOT comes in (it represents a nightly build in Maven naming parlance).

I suspect that since some people will want Lucene without Solr, it is probably going to be
necessary to create two distinct Maven targets for the Lucene/Solr project on the mirror,
and all built jars will need the appropriate suffix.  Might as well set up the nightlies and
the releases to have appropriate naming now...

Karl

________________________________________
From: ext Simon Willnauer [simon.willnauer@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 11:45 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar

I personally don't really care if it is called dev or SNAPSHOT. If it
helps other people to integrate current trunk code more easily and in
turn use the latest code for development I think we should do it.
Maybe I miss something why this is super important to be called "-dev"
if so please let me know. If it only is about somebodies preference
they could use -Ddev.version=4.0-dev too.

simon

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
> ah yes, that would work... still not great for integrating with solr
> and keeping the versions in sync though.  As a one-off just for me,
> that works fine, but I wonder more about getting snapshot builds as
> part of the hudson build scripts.
>
> perhaps 3.x, 4.x would be a good time to change some file names so
> they play nicer with maven (and does not really impact how things are
> currently done)
>
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Simon Willnauer
> <simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Can't you simply build it with ant -Ddev.version=4.0-SNAPSHOT
>> that should build a jar with the corresponding artifacts.
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> (hoping to avoid an anti-maven flame war)
>>>
>>> I'm looking at getting the ant tasks to play nice with maven again.
>>> In solr, there is a way to have the .jar files be "-dev.jar" but have
>>> the artifacts still map to -SNAPSHOT.jar.
>>>
>>> Getting the lucene ant scripts to do this is beyond my ant mojo, so it
>>> leads me to ask another question...
>>>
>>> How do people feel about renaming the lucene (and solr) dev .jar files
>>> from "-dev.jar" to "-SNAPSHOT.jar"?
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>> ryan
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message