lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Rowe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2167) Implement StandardTokenizer with the UAX#29 Standard
Date Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:14:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878307#action_12878307
] 

Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2167:
-------------------------------------

Ok, so for sentence boundaries, we're talking about a separate composable implementation.

What, then, will the replacement for StandardAnalyzer be?  This issue needs to include a substitute
definition when replacing StandardTokenizer.

 Which of these should be included, in addition to NewStandardTokenizer?:

# SentenceBoundaryCharFilter (clunky name, but descriptive)
# LowerCaseFilter
# StopFilter


> Implement StandardTokenizer with the UAX#29 Standard
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2167
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: contrib/analyzers
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Shyamal Prasad
>            Assignee: Steven Rowe
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch, LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch,
LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch, LUCENE-2167-lucene-buildhelper-maven-plugin.patch,
LUCENE-2167.benchmark.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch,
LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch,
LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
>
> It would be really nice for StandardTokenizer to adhere straight to the standard as much
as we can with jflex. Then its name would actually make sense.
> Such a transition would involve renaming the old StandardTokenizer to EuropeanTokenizer,
as its javadoc claims:
> bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most European-language documents
> The new StandardTokenizer could then say
> bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most languages.
> All the english/euro-centric stuff like the acronym/company/apostrophe stuff can stay
with that EuropeanTokenizer, and it could be used by the european analyzers.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message