Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53132 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 13:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 13:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 81686 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 13:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81639 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 13:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81632 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 13:31:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 13:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 13:31:07 +0000 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so1752176wwb.35 for ; Mon, 03 May 2010 06:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=GjYOgGqmodb156iRUCZ85Cd8dBwO1WjG9qnHMIwvgV0=; b=Uiywhn9GIiGC2RloKGF+Vfc9gfeLw+qzNed3aB4/BnuX1gRY1LvpgpdvaEqQ4RpnEv vmQyrzXFv7wPyD2CKsUTfg+J/sm1aRHEan9aCfWihXevDowxPTIPorJLl42qdulK1mx5 QzD+ksnlYiKK8A6zAjA3ogQilXa97r6YzAeiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wFVr3KUaOT7py13cpNQwozcd6NuBk2vEJuzEPRJ7JGYu95jD2sElvVEhn3EultFe0Q Wt+toB64qmtwDpXLeXCm9GkLSZuEWF1DMEJQZPzh66kOjKw+qLUlUp7BJyfJoanvBJ4N 3BwwJZJ07G1m5IkOLKTwYADuA9r5OLKssazww= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.203 with SMTP id u53mr3465424wee.184.1272893444977; Mon, 03 May 2010 06:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.22.140 with HTTP; Mon, 3 May 2010 06:30:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <003d01caeac1$a6deafc0$f49c0f40$@de> References: <003d01caeac1$a6deafc0$f49c0f40$@de> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 09:30:44 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 544b49e83ec41fad Message-ID: Subject: Re: BytesRef comparable From: Yonik Seeley To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > In current flex, the TermsEnum has a method called getComparator() that returns the comparator used in this TermsEnum. Gah.... more code that "may return null". Anyway, I made a mistake... Solr's BoundedTreeSet does accept a comparator. -Yonik Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010 18-21 May 2010 | Prague --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org