Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17449 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 16:28:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 16:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 70852 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:27:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70812 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:27:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70805 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 16:27:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:27:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:27:52 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1027060gwj.35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:27:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.213.16 with SMTP id l16mr9202519ybg.108.1273508847302; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.11.20 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:27:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:27:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When to use addIndexes and when addIndexesNoOptimize From: Michael McCandless To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 addIndexes accepts IndexReaders, so eg "foreign" IndexReader impls can be passed in (eg FilterIndexReader). While addIndexesNoOptimize accepts Directory, ie it gets a reader using IR.open. Mike On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > Hi > > As I was working on LUCENE-1585 and understanding more the differences > between addIndexes and addIndexesNoOptimize, I was wondering why do we have > those two methods? It seems like addIndexes's usage is discouraged, no? Can > someone please explain me why it isn't deprecated, and addIndexesNoOpt > becomes the default one? Are we losing any functionality? > > Shai > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org