Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <27044034.41871275016478790.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:14:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-1776) dismax and edismax should treate
 schema's default field as a default qf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-1776:
---------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 3.1
                   4.0


Correcting Fix Version based on CHANGES.txt, see this thread for more details...

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201005.mbox/%3Calpine.DEB.1.10.1005251052040.24672@radix.cryptio.net%3E

> dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1776
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>             Fix For: 1.5, 3.1, 4.0
>
>
> the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org