Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57459 invoked from network); 2 May 2010 17:58:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 May 2010 17:58:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 86314 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 17:58:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 86269 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 17:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 86262 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2010 17:58:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 17:58:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.25.71.29] (HELO mail.troja.net) (85.25.71.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 17:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15584D3600A; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:58:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.troja.net Received: from mail.troja.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (megaira.troja.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pn+nLlwgYa2X; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:57:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from VEGA (port-83-236-62-54.dynamic.qsc.de [83.236.62.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 017D8D36004; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:57:49 +0200 (CEST) From: "Uwe Schindler" To: , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: BytesRef comparable Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 19:58:09 +0200 Message-ID: <000901caea21$06edf980$14c9ec80$@de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcrqHY8lVYfOHde8RjiANi+pbiSRuQAA2I+w Content-Language: de When we do the refactoring in flex to remove the comparator, this would = be the first that comes to my mind. +1 ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: yseeley@gmail.com [mailto:yseeley@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 7:33 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: BytesRef comparable >=20 > Any objections to making BytesRef comparable? It would make it much > easier to use with containers that don't take comparators as > parameters. >=20 > -Yonik > Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010 > 18-21 May 2010 | Prague >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org