lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: BytesRef comparable
Date Mon, 03 May 2010 07:48:36 GMT
+1 sounds good

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> When we do the refactoring in flex to remove the comparator, this would be
>> the first that comes to my mind.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: yseeley@gmail.com [mailto:yseeley@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
>> > Seeley
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 7:33 PM
>> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: BytesRef comparable
>> >
>> > Any objections to making BytesRef comparable?  It would make it much
>> > easier to use with containers that don't take comparators as
>> > parameters.
>> >
>> > -Yonik
>> > Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
>> > 18-21 May 2010 | Prague
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message