lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: TestBackwardsCompatibility
Date Mon, 24 May 2010 18:19:26 GMT
Oops :z = 3x

Shai

On Monday, May 24, 2010, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
> So do we want to just remove the 1x indexes from :z and 2x from trunk?
> Or do we also want to remove the live migration code? How can one
> start with that for example? Are there constants to look for for
> example?
>
> Shai
>
> On Monday, May 24, 2010, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/24/10 11:25 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0:
>>
>>      http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
>>
>> So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by 2.0.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Shai Erera<serera@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm working on adding support for addIndexes* in TestBackwardsCompatibility,
>> and I've noticed it still reads 1.9 indexes. Is that intentional? Shouldn't
>> 3x stop supporting 1.9?
>>
>> Shai
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> We really need to update that wiki page - mucho changes.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message