lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Elschot <paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: Solr updateRequestHandler and performance vs. atomicity
Date Tue, 25 May 2010 18:56:41 GMT
Sounds like a distributed two phase commit is needed.
Would http://activemq.apache.org/ do the job?
If it does, camel (split off of activemq) has a lucene component
that could be of interest, too.

Regards,
Paul Elschot

Op dinsdag 25 mei 2010 14:59:29 schreef Yonik Seeley:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:10 AM,  <karl.wright@nokia.com> wrote:
> > In particular, it would be nice to be able to post documents in such a way
> > that you can guarantee that the document is permanently in Solr’s queue,
> > safe in the event of a Solr restart, etc., even if the document has not yet
> > been “committed”.
> 
> Yep, this is a longer term goal of SolrCloud.
> And to be truly safe, committing to stable storage is not enough -
> that still might crash and never recover.  One needs to write to
> multiple nodes.
> 
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message