Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58966 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 02:26:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 02:26:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 36029 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 02:26:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35982 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 02:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35974 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 02:26:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:26:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:26:13 +0000 Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so611457wyb.35 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rf9lJ6Yicv7TGY2GDZ26rJP3wpV8cO6PQ5PleQryXmU=; b=lx2v1Y4/4ZCQcedNZwVY21FAUOhRhJ3CvYFYbEc97oca8n8VKbFtIhhSIwEfHJjxXr f+bcpJw3O1H/FvEE5MsuuW7Ma5kUtQfZldD3t3/pDcrru8r+o/+xjyNUCHNqxS1qFjhK UXwQVqwO88x56v49Fnm0q2yzxcUk7fd2GKTSk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=laewLgA+mGnX/UBHo9QKnG4plZW0WaZ+gGvWyvJz+dnCXEMlRtiEIDYFfzwnOQGRND dyEt7RTbeFtVV5JtFnxY5LZvCJ8suwOdB2jJiArDzu+1S01ylUzFKbJQU78RtTvMH7Bd z8jUXn1o82oA40SMm1uGu/my7ZPE3nNdWxS6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.4 with SMTP id d4mr3213142wef.135.1272507952335; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.22.140 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:25:52 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3c9722a2a9dc9bbe Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr JUnit test methods steping on eachother? From: Yonik Seeley To: Chris Hostetter Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : That's extra time, and some test methods may rely on a persistent > : index across multiple test methods. =A0The move to Junit4 was not back > : compatible - test methods are not independent. > > Hmmm... except they were totally independent before. Conversion to the new style is not automatic - older style tests (those that extend TestCase) run as they always did. > I'm actually amazed that our tests pass at all There was a lot of work put into making them pass for those that were upgraded to the new style. -Yonik Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010 18-21 May 2010 | Prague --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org