Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <14195508.163261272040491355.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:34:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven Rowe (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2413) Consolidate all (Solr's
 & Lucene's) analyzers into contrib/analzyers
In-Reply-To: <11521962.147041271967229112.JavaMail.jira@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860304#action_12860304 ] 

Steven Rowe edited comment on LUCENE-2413 at 4/23/10 12:33 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Does consolidation include contrib/icu, too?

+1

Especially if we really go the route of individually packaging artifacts for & releasing each component separately.

      was (Author: steve_rowe):
    bq. Does consolidation include contrib/icu, too?

+1

Especially if we really go the route of individually packaging artificatcts for & releasing each component separately.
  
> Consolidate all (Solr's & Lucene's) analyzers into contrib/analzyers
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2413
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> We've been wanting to do this for quite some time now...  I think, now that Solr/Lucene are merged, and we're looking at opening an unstable line of development for Solr/Lucene, now is the right time to do it.
> A standalone module for all analyzers also empowers apps to separately version the analyzers from which version of Solr/Lucene they use, possibly enabling us to remove Version entirely from the analyzers.
> We should also do LUCENE-2309 (decouple, as much as possible, indexer from the analysis API), but I don't think that issue needs to block this consolidation.
> Once we do this, there is one place where our users can find all the analyzers that Solr/Lucene provide.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org