lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: TestCodecs running time
Date Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:25:00 GMT
Yah :)

TestStressIndexing2 is another slow one... I'll go fix it...

Mike

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
> See you already did that Mike :). Thanks ! now the tests run for 2s.
>
> Shai
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless
> <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's also slow because it repeats all the tests for each of the core
>> codecs (standard, sep, pulsing, intblock).
>>
>> I think it's fine to reduce the number of iterations -- just make sure
>> there's no seed to newRandom() so the distributing testing is
>> "effective".
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I've noticed that TestCodecs takes an insanely long time to run on my
>> > machine - between 35-40 seconds. Is that expected?
>> > The reason why it runs so long, seems to be that its threads make (each)
>> > 4000 iterations ... is that really required to ensure correctness?
>> >
>> > Shai
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message