lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: TestCodecs running time
Date Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:15:21 GMT
See you already did that Mike :). Thanks ! now the tests run for 2s.

Shai

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> It's also slow because it repeats all the tests for each of the core
> codecs (standard, sep, pulsing, intblock).
>
> I think it's fine to reduce the number of iterations -- just make sure
> there's no seed to newRandom() so the distributing testing is
> "effective".
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've noticed that TestCodecs takes an insanely long time to run on my
> > machine - between 35-40 seconds. Is that expected?
> > The reason why it runs so long, seems to be that its threads make (each)
> > 4000 iterations ... is that really required to ensure correctness?
> >
> > Shai
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message