lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
Subject Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"
Date Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:39:29 GMT
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:17:56AM -0700, Andi Vajda wrote:

> Using global statics is flawed.

+1.

I wonder if it's possible to solve this problem for Analyzers by decoupling
their distribution from the Lucene core and versioning them separately.  I.e.
remove MatchVersion and increment individual Analyzer version numbers instead.

This wouldn't solve the problem for good defaults elsewhere in the library.
For that, I see no remedy other than more frequent major version increments.

Marvin Humphrey


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message