lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2302) Replacement for TermAttribute+Impl with extended capabilities (byte[] support, CharSequence, Appendable)
Date Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:39:50 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2302:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-2302-toString.patch

Patch that fixes the toString() problems in Token and adds missing CHANGES.txt, fixes backwards
tests and updates javadocs to document the "backwards" break.

Deprecating Token should be done in another issue.

I will commit this soon, to be able to go forward with tokenstream conversion!

> Replacement for TermAttribute+Impl with extended capabilities (byte[] support, CharSequence,
Appendable)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2302
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: Flex Branch
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2302-toString.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch,
LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch
>
>
> For flexible indexing terms can be simple byte[] arrays, while the current TermAttribute
only supports char[]. This is fine for plain text, but e.g NumericTokenStream should directly
work on the byte[] array.
> Also TermAttribute lacks of some interfaces that would make it simplier for users to
work with them: Appendable and CharSequence
> I propose to create a new interface "CharTermAttribute" with a clean new API that concentrates
on CharSequence and Appendable.
> The implementation class will simply support the old and new interface working on the
same term buffer. DEFAULT_ATTRIBUTE_FACTORY will take care of this. So if somebody adds a
TermAttribute, he will get an implementation class that can be also used as CharTermAttribute.
As both attributes create the same impl instance both calls to addAttribute are equal. So
a TokenFilter that adds CharTermAttribute to the source will work with the same instance as
the Tokenizer that requested the (deprecated) TermAttribute.
> To also support byte[] only terms like Collation or NumericField needs, a separate getter-only
interface will be added, that returns a reusable BytesRef, e.g. BytesRefGetterAttribute. The
default implementation class will also support this interface. For backwards compatibility
with old self-made-TermAttribute implementations, the indexer will check with hasAttribute(),
if the BytesRef getter interface is there and if not will wrap a old-style TermAttribute (a
deprecated wrapper class will be provided): new BytesRefGetterAttributeWrapper(TermAttribute),
that is used by the indexer then.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message