Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1632 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2010 21:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2010 21:53:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 91734 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 21:53:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91698 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 21:53:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91691 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2010 21:53:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:53:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:53:36 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so210203wyf.35 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:53:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tN5LJb6oxiFIVnkvWwBgcOY8K4s3kn9/kFuUnHiEIsY=; b=tsX+yn5igc4/KGCnO6NiuhFgYZuFW0dfkNqjOVaj6TVt+yx2z33lpK9+tjUjTQr4Gs ruCfQ97ohHeBuuHji1sc074aezwyvOQ5Kn/e7WSNd54HtAvc8s4KU0K8DkSysP6clQ2Z 17i8JkrjUc0e3igDqa2+dVTojFOIqab8uXp/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IN00ZfQyveQ9NPTz7u2/0o2zzoxONLUrytG0/LfUjko+SOg6QWb52x5DlWUrQ/Ovn9 k5y8I5QxMEa+zqoyyXSuE0t74Cx1nwU5fHXdizC40aFXLW7HYRlTYG5WpWMaT1qj6MeT u+DsxVorxAcjNDAr2kdh/yUCgF+t3EE2etvkI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.86.208 with SMTP id w58mr47124wee.45.1268776396184; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:53:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4b124c311003161442t2d3d0ffeo551e9fd4cc63bcdd@mail.gmail.com> References: <9ac0c6aa1003161431h7b114644q2141b6221b2db6a8@mail.gmail.com> <4b124c311003161442t2d3d0ffeo551e9fd4cc63bcdd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:53:16 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: df2772c3d6dfcb85 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lucene and solr trunk From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> >> If we move lucene under Solr's existing svn path, ie: >> >> =A0/solr/trunk/lucene > > Chiming in just a bit here - isn't there any concern that independent of > whether or not people "can" > build lucene without checking out solr, the mere fact that Lucene will be > effectively a "subdirectory" > of solr... is there no concern that there will then be a perception that= Lucene is a subproject of > Solr, instead of vice-versa? Who would have this perception? Casual users will be using downloads. Likewise, should solr be concerned that it's currently under a lucene URL? How many casual users actually understand the difference between the lucene TLP and the lucene java subproject? This is really about what makes most sense for development. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org