Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85349 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 15:59:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 15:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 63355 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 15:59:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63309 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 15:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63302 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2010 15:59:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:59:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:59:13 +0000 Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so3414513pvg.35 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NcdGWYJQAKEKX4FxeH/NEjldHWlhF3gDS0KyvTvzHM8=; b=qPxIVfVkXiTSLFY3VXw2DBd5x4imN4ggUXrwwXBGSpv5Taon060k9pgzu8cq6FHtgJ LFln+9nmhGEKkvLcikPdSsJGL9kIt3eEoRQC3gSAaSeh8PLA1Z/gPUl/mGb9+76Qdxzp l0BoKmrBB8c+2EBYsYIVQ0HQrKOeEJ92YSh+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mvHjgtf65nUh6/H8EoWVJEln9zFwWjjBqWuX83xcN47y6FdYVjz9ED0IXIHfbFT2q4 9l2gpLX8QeB7TTwJPwzVnxcTFkh0OPMdL1n9fRHADB1M0iFdhbzkYYUI9THxIs1rf9Xf dmbE72IJrcu31M1dk2HbCEMVeWmzYqD9g4Ytg= Received: by 10.142.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr492228wfc.199.1269619132055; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ool-44c639d9.dyn.optonline.net [68.198.57.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v41sm156743wfh.21.2010.03.26.08.58.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BACD9B6.1070408@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:58:46 -0400 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100322 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Modules References: <8E4A31EF-2C00-4BFA-B249-F3CAE076EFFC@apache.org> <8f0ad1f31003260723o54212da7h292b7f2b63092fc3@mail.gmail.com> <59b3eb371003260729p52ab6c95q2e6fbd328f9566c8@mail.gmail.com> <786fde51003260815l7851abf9ncf96d21afd373448@mail.gmail.com> <003c01caccfc$ea522f80$bef68e80$@de> In-Reply-To: <003c01caccfc$ea522f80$bef68e80$@de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I also like the idea of a very basic analyzer set - I think you should still be able to do things with just the core jar - even if its only very basic things. On 03/26/2010 11:56 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > That will be also heavy ANT build refactoring (oh no...). But I am also for a basic analyzer set (without Standard!!!). > > Uwe > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shai Erera [mailto:serera@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:16 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Modules >> >> +1 for moving modules up one level. >> >> As for analyzers, I also prefer if lucene won't depend on modules even >> if just for the tests. That way one who doesn't use any module can >> check out lucene only. We can keep in lucene some basic analyzers >> (Whitespace, Simple) as well as a best out of the box choice - >> Standard for new users. >> >> Shai >> >> On Friday, March 26, 2010, Earwin Burrfoot wrote: >> >>>> Sounds good to me. I guess one thing to think about is the analyzers >>>> in core (should they move to this module, too?). >>>> If so, perhaps we could make 'ant test' of lucene depend on this >>>> module, since core tests use analyzers. >>>> But you could use lucene without an analyzers module, it wouldnt be >>>> >> a >> >>>> "real" dependency. >>>> >>> You can leave only most basic analyzers (one of them?) in core, >>> switching over the tests that currently use more advanced ones. >>> Then you move everything else to the module, along with analyzer- >>> >> specific tests. >> >>> -- >>> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com) >>> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423 >>> ICQ: 104465785 >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org