Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80082 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2010 11:30:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2010 11:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 88468 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 11:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88427 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 11:30:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88420 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2010 11:30:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:30:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.189] (HELO mail-qy0-f189.google.com) (209.85.221.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:30:03 +0000 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so1856276qyk.3 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wh4s9ZNPuGRIHRUPyBdc9xRGw+TjRaVkYJhMn1DPIew=; b=h93xR8vU1JRWDgCeAAFpsR21smYG7lH2AX0nwXSemcUSS5M3s0VxtUSapdP/R/GIHT x7eJ9oeLQVlK6gmsE4703SuxHGbjfUcQyOuRuJYDnmhE3nJqYU8m4ityVfOjq8/5c/dA jKzsNM7GpJ1xLNrbhB46o0sBf97ew6lmWAwoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C/mmBZS5C/aK9ruMSJFduCv3Mj8C12zHmkHctooLHBJiteZEPnPzdfH3b3j4eyQUiL BCeg4+6l9eofv6gLEJYVWSwE3C2acO5kIY3ti+bkDzV7NgtnTAkZM7JEx67am8dJKn/n nRl95auYBXeAJYCFAEqfEMJBQMpnx4f7GB0Y8= Received: by 10.224.35.143 with SMTP id p15mr1931320qad.36.1268738982646; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ool-44c639d9.dyn.optonline.net [68.198.57.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm12847598qwa.28.2010.03.16.04.29.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4B9F6BA3.8040009@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:29:39 -0400 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100222 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: lucene and solr trunk References: <016401cac4d8$eabf3520$c03d9f60$@de> <4B9F59F9.8030108@gmail.com> <69de18141003160405t68b8617fp6d37f19132837a66@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <69de18141003160405t68b8617fp6d37f19132837a66@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/16/2010 07:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > Wow, you guys are moving fast! Thats a good thing. > > IRC is fine if you want to discuss something quickly. But it has its > limitations. For example, I cannot follow IRC most of the times > because I'm in a different time zone. But I don't want to stop anyone > either. In fact, I can't do that. Nobody can. > > All I want to say is that once discussions have happened and a plan > agreed upon, it may be a good idea to let solr-dev/java-dev know the > plan. In this case I didn't know a new branch was created until I saw > was a commit notification and then Yonik's email. > Hi Shalin - I like your attitude ;) - Yonik's email was the notification of the plan :) Though we had no plan. When Robert and I made the branch we had no plan really - we just needed a place to put together our patches and do the final work. We were trying to do it with patches, but it was becoming difficult. But when we started we had no real plan - just to see if we could get Solr up and running on Lucene 3.01 and then trunk. Anything beyond that, we have not planned for - and before that was even completed, there were emails to java-dev about it. But we conceived nothing beyond seeing if we could get Solr running on the latest Lucene. From our perspective, we would have been just as happy with a branch on my local hard drive! That would have taken longer to setup though. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org