Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gsiasf@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=rAWnvimmBIumikXjsBSFmI0lVBM1Y0Gj3RcHLEVgaRr/huxKF+6p0Csr7aHF//GixY
         ywAjVoqyYPr//omwqrHH4KivNb3DBytVfFUJt6DktOcgGH1Xy0s5dsEddiTzwSE3KsOR
         kVxktpIBnrjOFDV2KkgDwmP8FPrINXJxEt0XQ=
Sender: Grant Ingersoll <gsiasf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do away with Contrib Committers and make core
 committers
From: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <c68e39171003141725w7536dc29g438a3a5fa17d20ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:30:04 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3AC7A701-0450-40B9-B517-AFB887C1AF89@apache.org>
References: <1DE0ED55-52A2-4EDB-A10D-1D99BFFA0607@apache.org>
 <00ed01cac3a0$9aa50490$cfef0db0$@de>
 <60D65D8C-87A3-46CF-ABBB-B8C0DC1E2B54@apache.org>
 <4B9D678E.9030509@gmail.com>
 <c68e39171003141725w7536dc29g438a3a5fa17d20ac@mail.gmail.com>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org


On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>=20
>>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> This time a +1 without discuss :-)
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE!  :-)
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I had a whole spiel about earning merit, and some contrib committers =
were
>> made contrib committers for just a single contrib, some long ago, =
didn't
>> have to necessarily show they understood/followed the apache way, =
lower bar
>> (not necessarily from talent perspective, but you might be made a =
contrib
>> committer just to maintain the code module you contributed, whether =
you
>> worked with the community or not), etc, etc.
>=20
> Hmmm, yeah - when it is time to VOTE, there are actually two different
> questions here:

Agreed.

> 1) if lucene should move away from contrib committers, adding no new =
ones

Yes, this is what I'm thinking.  All future committers would be based on =
contributions to the project and there would be no distinction between =
contrib/core.

> 2) if all existing contrib committers should immediately become core
> lucene/solr committers, or if that promotion should proceed in the
> normal fashion as it has in the past.

I'm fine w/ all of them, except we might want to check to see if it has =
been more than a year of contributing and ask any of them if they want =
to be Emeritus.

-Grant=

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org