Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18320 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 17:42:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 17:42:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 27633 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 17:42:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 27506 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 17:42:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 27485 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2010 17:42:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:42:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:42:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573AB234C4FB for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1366325424.514031269625347356.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:42:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2324) Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments In-Reply-To: <966773572.259991268631687364.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850244#action_12850244 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324: -------------------------------------------- But if 1 thread tends to index lots of biggish docs... don't we want to allow it to use up more than 1/nth? Ie we don't want to flush unless total RAM usage has hit the limit? > Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Michael Busch > Assignee: Michael Busch > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1 > > > See LUCENE-2293 for motivation and more details. > I'm copying here Mike's summary he posted on 2293: > Change the approach for how we buffer in RAM to a more isolated > approach, whereby IW has N fully independent RAM segments > in-process and when a doc needs to be indexed it's added to one of > them. Each segment would also write its own doc stores and > "normal" segment merging (not the inefficient merge we now do on > flush) would merge them. This should be a good simplification in > the chain (eg maybe we can remove the *PerThread classes). The > segments can flush independently, letting us make much better > concurrent use of IO & CPU. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org