Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83628 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 01:44:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 01:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 99720 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 01:44:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 99566 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 01:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 99558 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 01:44:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:44:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:44:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8B7234C48D for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <133638124.332621268876667242.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:44:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hoss Man (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2323) reorganize contrib modules In-Reply-To: <304767311.256581268590287174.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846712#action_12846712 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-2323: ---------------------------------- bq. I didn't know this was the goal, if what you say is true, then I must say i completely misunderstood, I completely disagree, and I'm completely off-base with this issue. I'm not saying it is a goal, or should be a goal, just that i seem to remember that this was teh direction that seemed to have support the last time i remember there being a big "reorg the contribs" discussion. (i could be remembering wrong, it could be that *I* thought it was a really great idea at the time so it stuck with me, and now i'm just more ambivalent) A quick skim suggests this is the most recent thread i'm thinking of... http://old.nabble.com/New-flexible-query-parser-to22549684.html#a22637326 ("kitchen sink" was the search term i was looking for) ...but i don't think that was the first time it came up. > reorganize contrib modules > -------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/* > Reporter: Robert Muir > > it would be nice to reorganize contrib modules, so that they are bundled together by functionality. > For example: > * the wikipedia contrib is a tokenizer, i think really belongs in contrib/analyzers > * there are two highlighters, i think could be one highlighters package. > * there are many queryparsers and queries in different places in contrib -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org