Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <1129791848.601751270036707472.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:58:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and
 Field complexity
In-Reply-To: <450034234.209721268334627462.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851829#action_12851829 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310:
------------------------------------

+1 for this simplification. Can we just name it Indexable, and omit Document from it? That way, it's both shorter and less chances for users to directly link it w/ Document.

One thing I didn't understand though, is what will happen to ir/is.doc() method? Will those be deprecated in favor of some other class which receives an IR as parameter and knows how to re-construct Indexable(Document)?

> Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Chris Male
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-AbstractField-CleanField.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-AbstractField.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-AbstractField.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-AbstractField.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-DocumentGetFields-core.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-DocumentGetFields.patch, LUCENE-2310-Deprecate-DocumentGetFields.patch
>
>
> In order to move field type like functionality into its own class, we really need to try to tackle the hierarchy of Fieldable, AbstractField and Field.  Currently AbstractField depends on Field, and does not provide much more functionality that storing fields, most of which are being moved over to FieldType.  Therefore it seems ideal to try to deprecate AbstractField (and possible Fieldable), moving much of the functionality into Field and FieldType.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org