lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <>
Subject Re: lucene and solr trunk
Date Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:30:34 GMT
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Michael McCandless
<> wrote:
> I think it like the 1st option best (lucene moves as subdir to solr's
> current trunk SVN path), but I don't feel strongly.
> This'd mean one could simply checkout lucene alone and do everything
> you can do today.
> But if you check out solr, you also get a full checkout of lucene, and
> solr's build.xml will go and build lucene, copy over its jars to its
> lib folder, and then do everything it currently does.
> I think?
> This small step is not much change over what we have today -- the code
> simply moves, unchanged, except for some fixes to solr's build.xml to
> go and build its lucene subdir first.

Huh - I was leaning more toward putting solr under lucene because I
thought that might be more acceptable to the lucene folks (actually,
now lucene/solr folks) than vice-versa.

But your points make perfect sense.

> The bigger stuff, ideas on modules like renaming contrib->modules,
> consolidating all analyzers, queries, queryparsers, highlighters, all
> comes later.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message