lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: Baby steps towards making Lucene's scoring more flexible...
Date Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:47:08 GMT
I think that's a good idea for Lucy.

Mike

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Marvin Humphrey
<marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:24:34AM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> > Maybe aggressive automatic data-reduction makes more sense in the context of
>> > "flexible matching", which is more expansive than "flexible scoring"?
>>
>> I think so.  Maybe it shouldn't be called a Similarity (which to me
>> (though, carrying a heavy curse of knowledge burden...) means
>> "scoring")?  Matcher?
>
> I think we can express the difference between your proposed approach for
> Lucene Similarity (no effect on index) and my proposed approach for Lucy
> Similarity (aggressive index-time data reduction) by putting Lucy's Similarity
> under Lucy::Index instead of Lucy::Search.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message