lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Modules
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:24:04 GMT
2010/3/26 Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com>:
> +1 for moving modules up one level.
>
> As for analyzers, I also prefer if lucene won't depend on modules even
> if just for the tests. That way one who doesn't use any module can
> check out lucene only. We can keep in lucene some basic analyzers
> (Whitespace, Simple) as well as a best out of the box choice -
> Standard for new users.
>
> Shai

Shai, personally i am happy just to try to merge in the solr
functionality with what we have in contrib, so it doesn't matter too
much. But at the same time maybe we should reconsider this
Whitespace/Simple/Standard case. I do think its a little wierd to have
analyzers scattered all over the place... but two places instead of
three is still an improvement.

I would really love to see them all in one place though, for the
users. I think that the elegance of our tests should be second to the
users ease.
Perhaps we could just have a fast and dirty TestAnalyzer so the core
tests don't need to depend on analyzers instead???

-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message