lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Modules
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:22:55 GMT
+1 for basic analyzers in core and TestAnalyzer. Though that's what I
suggested last time it was discussed and the response I got was that
Lucene should offer out of the box great analyzer and does not require
additional modules. If we move all useful ones to modules, users will
need to download analyzers.jar.

Personally I'm ok with it.

Shai

On Friday, March 26, 2010, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> And in my opinion we should fork a 3.1 branch before!
>
> Uwe
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmiller@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:59 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Modules
>>
>> I also like the idea of a very basic analyzer set - I think you should
>> still be able to do things with just the core jar - even if its only
>> very basic things.
>>
>> On 03/26/2010 11:56 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> > That will be also heavy ANT build refactoring (oh no...). But I am
>> also for a basic analyzer set (without Standard!!!).
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Shai Erera [mailto:serera@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:16 PM
>> >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Modules
>> >>
>> >> +1 for moving modules up one level.
>> >>
>> >> As for analyzers, I also prefer if lucene won't depend on modules
>> even
>> >> if just for the tests. That way one who doesn't use any module can
>> >> check out lucene only. We can keep in lucene some basic analyzers
>> >> (Whitespace, Simple) as well as a best out of the box choice -
>> >> Standard for new users.
>> >>
>> >> Shai
>> >>
>> >> On Friday, March 26, 2010, Earwin Burrfoot<earwin@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Sounds good to me. I guess one thing to think about is the
>> analyzers
>> >>>> in core (should they move to this module, too?).
>> >>>> If so, perhaps we could make 'ant test' of lucene depend on this
>> >>>> module, since core tests use analyzers.
>> >>>> But you could use lucene without an analyzers module, it wouldnt
>> be
>> >>>>
>> >> a
>> >>
>> >>>> "real" dependency.
>> >>>>
>> >>> You can leave only most basic analyzers (one of them?) in core,
>> >>> switching over the tests that currently use more advanced ones.
>> >>> Then you move everything else to the module, along with analyzer-
>> >>>
>> >> specific tests.
>> >>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
>> >>> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
>> >>> ICQ: 104465785
>> >>>
>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message