lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Modules
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:15:38 GMT
+1 for moving modules up one level.

As for analyzers, I also prefer if lucene won't depend on modules even
if just for the tests. That way one who doesn't use any module can
check out lucene only. We can keep in lucene some basic analyzers
(Whitespace, Simple) as well as a best out of the box choice -
Standard for new users.

Shai

On Friday, March 26, 2010, Earwin Burrfoot <earwin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds good to me. I guess one thing to think about is the analyzers
>> in core (should they move to this module, too?).
>> If so, perhaps we could make 'ant test' of lucene depend on this
>> module, since core tests use analyzers.
>> But you could use lucene without an analyzers module, it wouldnt be a
>> "real" dependency.
>
> You can leave only most basic analyzers (one of them?) in core,
> switching over the tests that currently use more advanced ones.
> Then you move everything else to the module, along with analyzer-specific tests.
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@gmail.com)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message