lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: lucene and solr trunk
Date Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:59:11 GMT
Where would the modules live?

I'm not sure if I sent it on this thread or somewhere else, but what about
my proposal to have all three sitting under their own directories, w/ their
own trunk/branch/tags, and if it's easier for dev then put all three under
one root (for permission management maybe)?

Shai

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael McCandless
> > <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If we move lucene under Solr's existing svn path, ie:
> >>
> >>  /solr/trunk/lucene
> >
> > Chiming in just a bit here - isn't there any concern that independent of
> > whether or not people "can"
> > build lucene without checking out solr, the mere fact that Lucene will be
> > effectively a "subdirectory"
> > of solr...  is there no concern that there will then be a perception that
> Lucene is a subproject of
> > Solr, instead of vice-versa?
>
> Who would have this perception?
> Casual users will be using downloads.
>
> Likewise, should solr be concerned that it's currently under a lucene
> URL?  How many casual users actually understand the difference between
> the lucene TLP and the lucene java subproject?
>
> This is really about what makes most sense for development.
>
> -Yonik
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message