lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2302) Replacement for TermAttribute+Impl with extended capabilities (byte[] support, CharSequence, Appendable)
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:35:27 GMT


Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2302:

I like the name CharTermAttribute.

How about instead of TermToBytesRefAttribute we name it TermBytesAttribute?  (Ie, drop the
"To" and "Ref").

> Replacement for TermAttribute+Impl with extended capabilities (byte[] support, CharSequence,
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2302
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: Flex Branch
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: Flex Branch
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch, LUCENE-2302.patch,
> For flexible indexing terms can be simple byte[] arrays, while the current TermAttribute
only supports char[]. This is fine for plain text, but e.g NumericTokenStream should directly
work on the byte[] array.
> Also TermAttribute lacks of some interfaces that would make it simplier for users to
work with them: Appendable and CharSequence
> I propose to create a new interface "CharTermAttribute" with a clean new API that concentrates
on CharSequence and Appendable.
> The implementation class will simply support the old and new interface working on the
same term buffer. DEFAULT_ATTRIBUTE_FACTORY will take care of this. So if somebody adds a
TermAttribute, he will get an implementation class that can be also used as CharTermAttribute.
As both attributes create the same impl instance both calls to addAttribute are equal. So
a TokenFilter that adds CharTermAttribute to the source will work with the same instance as
the Tokenizer that requested the (deprecated) TermAttribute.
> To also support byte[] only terms like Collation or NumericField needs, a separate getter-only
interface will be added, that returns a reusable BytesRef, e.g. BytesRefGetterAttribute. The
default implementation class will also support this interface. For backwards compatibility
with old self-made-TermAttribute implementations, the indexer will check with hasAttribute(),
if the BytesRef getter interface is there and if not will wrap a old-style TermAttribute (a
deprecated wrapper class will be provided): new BytesRefGetterAttributeWrapper(TermAttribute),
that is used by the indexer then.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message