lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2351) optimize automatonquery
Date Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:30:27 GMT


Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2351:

This one should be final:
+  public SeekStatus seek(BytesRef text) throws IOException {
+    return seek(text, true);
+  }
As codecs and other implementations should only override the other one. And it will get inlined.

> optimize automatonquery
> -----------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2351
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: Flex Branch
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Flex Branch
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2351.patch
> Mike found a few cases in flex where we have some bad behavior with automatonquery.
> The problem is similar to a database query planner, where sometimes simply doing a full
table scan is faster than using an index.
> We can optimize automatonquery a little bit, and get better performance for fuzzy,wildcard,regex
> Here is a list of ideas:
> * create commonSuffixRef for infinite automata, not just really-bad linear scan cases
> * do a null check rather than populating an empty commonSuffixRef
> * localize the 'linear' case to not seek, but instead scan, when ping-ponging against
loops in the state machine
> * add a mechanism to enable/disable the terms dict cache, e.g. we can disable it for
infinite cases, and maybe fuzzy N>1 also.
> * change the use of BitSet to OpenBitSet or long[] gen for path-tracking
> * optimize the backtracking code where it says /* String is good to go as-is */, this
need not be a full run(), I think...

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message