Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29489 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2010 18:03:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2010 18:03:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 98844 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2010 17:55:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98784 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2010 17:55:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98772 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2010 17:55:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:55:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:55:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294BD29A0014 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:55:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <437750552.283061266256528167.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Harwood (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1720) TimeLimitedIndexReader and associated utility class In-Reply-To: <1355196630.1246227287460.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833902#action_12833902 ] Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1720: -------------------------------------- bq. Mark, the only thing that remains is to convert TimeLimitingIndexReaderBenchmark to a benchmark algorithm/task. Would you mind taking a stab at this? Will need to look at existing benchmark tasks for guidance. I may get some time later. > TimeLimitedIndexReader and associated utility class > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1720 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Index > Reporter: Mark Harwood > Assignee: Mark Harwood > Priority: Minor > Attachments: ActivityTimedOutException.java, ActivityTimeMonitor.java, ActivityTimeMonitor.java, ActivityTimeMonitor.java, LUCENE-1720.patch, Lucene-1720.patch, Lucene-1720.patch, LUCENE-1720.patch, TestTimeLimitedIndexReader.java, TestTimeLimitedIndexReader.java, TimeLimitedIndexReader.java, TimeLimitedIndexReader.java > > > An alternative to TimeLimitedCollector that has the following advantages: > 1) Any reader activity can be time-limited rather than just single searches e.g. the document retrieve phase. > 2) Times out faster (i.e. runaway queries such as fuzzies detected quickly before last "collect" stage of query processing) > Uses new utility timeout class that is independent of IndexReader. > Initial contribution includes a performance test class but not had time as yet to work up a formal Junit test. > TimeLimitedIndexReader is coded as JDK1.5 but can easily be undone. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org