Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <335179400.112101265591728187.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:15:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2080) Improve the documentation of
 Version
In-Reply-To: <78423605.1258558599747.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830804#action_12830804 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2080:
--------------------------------------------

I like the new scary javadoc Robert!  I think removing (deprecating today) LUCENE_CURRENT may make sense -- it's very dangerous.

> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely involves reindexing your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org