Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50444 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2010 18:09:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2010 18:09:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 98805 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2010 15:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98736 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2010 15:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98718 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2010 15:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1686E234C1F0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:19:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1774182630.279731266247168091.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833835#action_12833835 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-329: ------------------------------------ bq. I'm probably more interested in a partial match on the rarer surname than a partial match on the common forename. Obliterating IDF completely as a factor would lose this feature (available in FuzzyLikeThisQuery) oh I see, this issue is really different from LUCENE-124 (they arent technically duplicates). I can move my patch there. You can still create a 'smarter' method here, it won't get in the way as now FuzzyQuery does not have a hardcoded rewrite method. > Fuzzy query scoring issues > -------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 1.2rc5 > Environment: Operating System: All > Platform: All > Reporter: Mark Harwood > Assignee: Lucene Developers > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LUCENE-329.patch, patch.txt > > > Queries which automatically produce multiple terms (wildcard, range, prefix, > fuzzy etc)currently suffer from two problems: > 1) Scores for matching documents are significantly smaller than term queries > because of the volume of terms introduced (A match on query Foo~ is 0.1 > whereas a match on query Foo is 1). > 2) The rarer forms of expanded terms are favoured over those of more common > forms because of the IDF. When using Fuzzy queries for example, rare mis- > spellings typically appear in results before the more common correct spellings. > I will attach a patch that corrects the issues identified above by > 1) Overriding Similarity.coord to counteract the downplaying of scores > introduced by expanding terms. > 2) Taking the IDF factor of the most common form of expanded terms as the > basis of scoring all other expanded terms. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org