Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5754 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 12:15:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 12:15:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 43973 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 12:15:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43933 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 12:15:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43926 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 12:15:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A6A234C4A9 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:15:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <107220989.523161267100127988.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shai Erera (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2285) Code cleanup from all sorts of (trivial) warnings In-Reply-To: <441548908.516151267072227868.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838319#action_12838319 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2285: ------------------------------------ Uwe, what should I do w/ Version.LUCENE_CURRENT? It is deprecated, however lots of tests are using it. Do they need to reference LUCENE_31? What will happen in future versions? Every release we'll change all the tests? I remember a discussion about this, just trying to figure out how to change the tests now. > Code cleanup from all sorts of (trivial) warnings > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2285 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Shai Erera > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1 > > > I would like to do some code cleanup and remove all sorts of trivial warnings, like unnecessary casts, problems w/ javadocs, unused variables, redundant null checks, unnecessary semicolon etc. These are all very trivial and should not pose any problem. > I'll create another issue for getting rid of deprecated code usage, like LuceneTestCase and all sorts of deprecated constructors. That's also trivial because it only affects Lucene code, but it's a different type of change. > Another issue I'd like to create is about introducing more generics in the code, where it's missing today - not changing existing API. There are many places in the code like that. > So, with you permission, I'll start with the trivial ones first, and then move on to the others. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org