Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98159 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 10:16:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 10:16:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 9979 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 10:16:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9908 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 10:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9900 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 10:16:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:16:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:16:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D775A234C052 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:16:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <101493262.176051265796987881.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:16:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2111) Wrapup flexible indexing In-Reply-To: <856134490.1259883021256.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831935#action_12831935 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2111: -------------------------------------------- Robert, I think flex was faster before because the previous impl of Multi*Enums was using the same Docs/AndPositionsEnums before. This patch fixes that. > Wrapup flexible indexing > ------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-2111 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Affects Versions: Flex Branch > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 3.1 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2111-EmptyTermsEnum.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111_fuzzy.patch > > > Spinoff from LUCENE-1458. > The flex branch is in fairly good shape -- all tests pass, initial search performance testing looks good, it survived several visits from the Unicode policeman ;) > But it still has a number of nocommits, could use some more scrutiny especially on the "emulate old API on flex index" and vice/versa code paths, and still needs some more performance testing. I'll do these under this issue, and we should open separate issues for other self contained fixes. > The end is in sight! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org