lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2080) Improve the documentation of Version
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:47:28 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2080:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-2080.patch

I think this wording is even better and scarier:
* i bolded *re-index all your documents* in the previous wording.
* i added another sentence: Additionally, you may need to *re-test your entire application*
to ensure it now does what you want, as some defaults may have changed and may break functionality
in your application.

> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely involves reindexing
your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message