lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2080) Improve the documentation of Version
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:01:30 GMT


Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2080:

I like this extension and I think it is important! Yet, I would use the following wording

{quote}Additionally, you may need to re-test your entire application to ensure it behaves
like expected, as some defaults may have changed and may break functionality in your application.{quote}

> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2080
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely involves reindexing
your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message