lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2080) Improve the documentation of Version
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:01:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830760#action_12830760
] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2080:
-----------------------------------------


I like this extension and I think it is important! Yet, I would use the following wording
instead:

{quote}Additionally, you may need to re-test your entire application to ensure it behaves
like expected, as some defaults may have changed and may break functionality in your application.{quote}


> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely involves reindexing
your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message