Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <1479627543.1258743221242.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:53:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Tim Smith (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2086) When resolving deletes, IW should
 resolve in term sort order
In-Reply-To: <220303101.1258728339970.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12780710#action_12780710 ] 

Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2086:
-----------------------------------

bq. maybe try it & report back?

i'll see if i can find some cycles to try this against the most painful use case i have

bq. I'd rather see us release a 3.1 sooner rather than later, instead.

yes please.
I would definitely like to see a more accelerated release cycle (even if less functionality gets into each minor release)

> When resolving deletes, IW should resolve in term sort order
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2086
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2086.patch
>
>
> See java-dev thread "IndexWriter.updateDocument performance improvement".

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org