lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1799) Unicode compression
Date Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:16:17 GMT
Steven, do you still have a test setup to measure collation key generation
performance with Lucene?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> > Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve
> > IndexableBinaryStringTools by using char[]/byte[] with offset and
> > length. The existing ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are
> > consistent with Charset api and are not wrong imo, but instead defer to
> > the new char[]/byte[] ones... the current buffer-based ones require the
> > buffer to have a backing array anyway or will throw an exception.
>
> +1
>
> I used *Buffers because I thought it simplified method prototypes, no other
> reason.
>
> Steve
>
>


-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message