lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why release 3.0?
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:29:55 GMT
Robert Muir wrote:
>
>
>>     and I think it sucks they might have to reindex twice with the
>>     current status of things (we did not complete unicode 4 support
>>     in lucene 3.0)
>>     which is why i mentioned this problem on the unicode 4 issues im
>>     trying to work.
>
>     Whether 3.0 goes out as it is now or with these fixes is up to the
>     voters.
>
>
> The problem is that we want 3.0 to be a 'clean' release with no
> deprecations.
> It is impossible to do so, and also have unicode 4 support in 3.0 (we
> will need to deprecate a few things)
> We couldnt do this in 2.9, because you need jdk 1.5 or icu to do even
> basic stuff like (U)Character.isLetter(int) :)
>  
>
>
Always depends though. This double index thing you mention is nasty (3.0
and 3.1 for the unfortunate). I'd swallow a few careful deprecations in
3.0 to avoid that with my vote.

-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message