lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2052) Scan method signatures and add varargs where possible
Date Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:18:39 GMT


Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2052:

bq. Thanks, I didn't check contrib.

I didn't really completely check, not sure really where we should have varargs there.
(it does not make sense for stopwords to me, but then I feel all we need is Set<?> instead
of file, varargs, hashtable, and all the other constructors we have)

still i'd rather have consistency for now.

> Scan method signatures and add varargs where possible
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2052
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 3.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2052.patch, LUCENE-2052.patch, LUCENE-2052_fa.patch
> I changed a lot of signatures, but there may be more. The important ones like MultiReader
and MultiSearcher are already done. This applies also to contrib. Varargs are no backwards
break, they stay arrays as before.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message