Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36312 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2009 20:44:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2009 20:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 18504 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 20:44:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 18446 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 20:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 18438 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2009 20:44:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.173] (HELO mail-pz0-f173.google.com) (209.85.222.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:43:57 +0000 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so1472578pzk.20 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=c0v+tvlt8Ifzb/X3Kw1TbKeeRDEdn0CYz4FPiTGJdFs=; b=c90uzitFg4Q6SyeHBOwJ7bfqhGsJypbb5XnMZgTlY9MAHhKPHvE56h794zFS6Hz90W t+UzQqXSpE7Q8UaLSp4SoIeC18kZYd9uXMbOORAi4qHZaEV43002CMOKKiXvq18sdy32 bIIN13h0df+6k9pS0/rlver6NNaL8JHhN3YPc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=P3ayjETEgnbezcNKdzjd2wehIEnyYQqvm9ngjYtqz/JK6kjBW62H2M6L8xMsVV7XU+ tlLi9bEl2qu2FkzaliFoNEjCLgcDBGe914Z5tE28J7a+wK04fjbwHSI7LussziKkCQRS BqsR2YEOgslIOJHm/6tReP99uAaeoViXJLB0k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.69.13 with SMTP id r13mr636893waa.16.1254948216192; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1907500234.1254947491432.JavaMail.jira@brutus> References: <1907500234.1254947491432.JavaMail.jira@brutus> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:43:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (LUCENE-1958) ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or normal behaviour ? To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502e8b1a33f7904755e66f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502e8b1a33f7904755e66f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bug. On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, MRIT64 (JIRA) wrote: > ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or > normal behaviour ? > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1958 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/analyzers > Affects Versions: 2.4.1 > Environment: Windows XP / jdk1.6.0_15 > Reporter: MRIT64 > Priority: Minor > > > HI > > I add two consecutive documents that are indexed with some filters. The > last one is ShingleFilter. > ShingleFilter creates a shingle spannnig the two documents, which has no > sense in my context. > Is that a bug oris it ShingleFilter normal behaviour ? If it's normal > behaviour, is it possible to change it optionnaly ? > > Thanks > > MR > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve --00504502e8b1a33f7904755e66f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bug.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, = MRIT64 (JIRA) <jira= @apache.org> wrote:
ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or n= ormal behaviour ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Key: LUCENE-1958 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 URL: https://= issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Project: Lucene - Java
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Issue Type: Bug
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Components: contrib/analyzers
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Affects Versions: 2.4.1
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Environment: Windows XP / jdk1.6.0_15
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Reporter: MRIT64
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Priority: Minor


HI

I add two consecutive documents that are indexed with some filters. The las= t one is ShingleFilter.
ShingleFilter creates a shingle spannnig the two documents, which has no se= nse in my context.
Is that a bug oris it =C2=A0ShingleFilter normal behaviour ? If it's no= rmal behaviour, is it possible to change it optionnaly ?

Thanks

MR

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org




--
Ted Dunning, CTO
Dee= pDyve

--00504502e8b1a33f7904755e66f9--