Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86392 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 22:04:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 22:04:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 52751 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 22:04:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52688 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 22:04:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52680 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 22:04:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:04:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:04:39 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so1428700ewy.5 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ZQnuynTN9AqZ5b6pzJc+cCq3ZoU+LmQCk3vz6FJW4SY=; b=i8a8b83oi+UqWUOmbEzRJ1n/HQ3oIQfrubfCWtVjx68dj3KpVbTqHEb4+KfeDjaF0b HDESEYP4AyWfl5vwgmNBocuC+TiQFXH7DvOUn7sX17gaqmpATTc1plpntL11l7EbnUNQ mX1+gvvWdf2TtCowofP9EjI1iGxVJhbu8uHdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QOiZ28Y8yxS3zePGDXnqBL9vYb2Z58WRtHDw8WbvJaCxGMmlQEVW9dIBW23uBJRKI3 5iGZXgAF6OMa2MIXA1lT7Ud3gq5tSxerU58U5DVMY6hctmfCacPIZLQWBrQyjrehEUuS 13+fWbVMdoECeTS1hVO0UBEnwdEkhp2xEFoVU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.93.4 with SMTP id k4mr281444wef.155.1255644258576; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9ac0c6aa0910151433k70df1a2cy1a67549a3e8d5def@mail.gmail.com> References: <8837fb770910142012w5f11ba57y99aeb18493603813@mail.gmail.com> <4b124c310910150131w6bea9e07ne4ab07d00faa0e2e@mail.gmail.com> <9ac0c6aa0910150312r1492cc23i7a0e770919613780@mail.gmail.com> <4b124c310910151252p2ee8f51ah33e4285dfa05dac2@mail.gmail.com> <9ac0c6aa0910151433k70df1a2cy1a67549a3e8d5def@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:04:18 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 024a46de1e0617f9 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lucene 2.9 sorting algorithm From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Though it'd be odd if the switch to searching by segment > really was most of the gains here. I had assumed that much of the improvement was due to ditching MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs. Note that LUCENE-1483 was before LUCENE-1596... but that only helps with queries that use a TermEnum (range, prefix, etc). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org