Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de>
To: <java-dev@lucene.apache.org>
References: <C43B8A7D81E54A9E81AAD411C141E4DB@VEGA>
 <4AC698E4.1050606@gmail.com>
 <59b3eb370910021918h797027e8qf30761dd22e8f6e5@mail.gmail.com>
 <9ac0c6aa0910030235m4fa09700n76b15156c79252c5@mail.gmail.com>
 <FF5080AF7B94413A8D2168D57F7C69F2@VEGA>
 <9ac0c6aa0910030254k3eeabb37l886d9935a76ed165@mail.gmail.com>
 <4AC72413.7080900@gmail.com> <6A65C5585637407AB380DFB7585CAFF4@VEGA>
 <9ac0c6aa0910030320j235ff4f0ja2a407a689b47c92@mail.gmail.com>
 <54B13762B6404012A720BC3AB800D26D@VEGA>
 <9ac0c6aa0910030329m54cf7015n36413aa89c53f09f@mail.gmail.com>
 <8646756A0CC049DCAA46F5E03F18A0D8@VEGA>
 <7EDA76EC27934F0D8710E22956EE595E@VEGA>
 <3FE0CB910F8B4570A88ACD0362CA5645@VEGA>
Subject: RE: Lucene 2.9 and deprecated IR.open() methods
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:57:44 +0200
Message-ID: <EB1E014550CF45FEA5524FEFECED9325@VEGA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3FE0CB910F8B4570A88ACD0362CA5645@VEGA>
Thread-Index: AcpEFH2OkDXakEayRWelk1Qmnet7ggAABNxwAAA5qmAAAtrPMAAGN/0g

Do not wonder, I will now commit lots of test fixes for IR.open() in
backwards branch and then merge to trunk!

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 2:00 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene 2.9 and deprecated IR.open() methods
> 
> This seems to work, I have created some scripts that do the compilations
> and
> create a deprecation report and I start to fix in BW branch. The easieist
> is
> first to just remove a lot of tests, that only test the BW compatibility
> API.
> 
> I will post something, as soon as I have removed most deprec warnings.
> 
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 12:39 PM
> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Lucene 2.9 and deprecated IR.open() methods
> >
> > I have a plan how to do the tests:
> >
> > I use my BW branch checkout and enable deprecation warnings there. I
> then
> > start to fix  all deprec usage and remove all code parts that are only
> > there
> > to test bw compatibility (e.g. TestTokenStreamBWCompatibiliy). After
> that
> > the test should compile without deprec warnings. When this is done
> commit
> > and create new TAG.
> >
> > After that apply the patch also to trunk -> tests should compile :-)
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 12:33 PM
> > > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Lucene 2.9 and deprecated IR.open() methods
> > >
> > > > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 12:29 PM
> > > > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 and deprecated IR.open() methods
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> wrote:
> > > > > Now it gets slower. After applying LUCENE-1944, you get >600
> errors
> > > when
> > > > > compiling tests :(
> > > > >
> > > > > We should have checked our tests in 2.9 that they only call
> > deprecated
> > > > > methods for BW compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Sigh.  Yes, going forward we should probably always fix tests to not
> > > > use deprecated APIs anymore, at the same time that we deprecate.
> > > > > Now I have to change tons of IR.open(), IW()
> > > > > calls in backwards branch and also in trunk tests. But the patch
> is
> > > > > currently the same for both branches - puh.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we should re-cut the back-compat branch after removal of all
> > > > deprecated APIs?
> > >
> > >
> > > No, better apply the patch on both branches. Because I changed
> generics
> > in
> > > TokenStream API and want to be sure, that not generified BW branch
> > works.
> > > Now it would not even compile anymore, because BW branch is forced to
> > Java
> > > 1.4. The simpliest is really to create a patch and apply it to both
> > > branches
> > > or merge it using SVN. That's my smallest problem.
> > >
> > > > > Completely unhappy :-(
> > > >
> > > > Sorry :(  Take a deep breath.  Go consume some coffee or dark
> > > > chocolate (or, maybe, a beer!) :)
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org