Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13855 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2009 12:30:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2009 12:30:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 67509 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 12:30:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67417 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 12:30:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67401 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2009 12:30:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:30:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:29:55 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so4536527ywh.5 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.163.10 with SMTP id l10mr4637244ybe.223.1254918574044; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1498960617.1254916892320.JavaMail.jira@brutus> References: <1307591248.1227004424235.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <1498960617.1254916892320.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:29:33 -0400 Message-ID: <9ac0c6aa0910070529i74b3c9c9he7d30fb997ee7112@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing From: Michael McCandless To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA) wrote: > it only complained about the $id issue in wildcardtermenum This bites me all the time. Can we simply remove all $Id tags from the class javadocs? Is there some value to having $Id in the javadocs? It produces a line like this: * @version $Id: WildcardTermEnum.java 783371 2009-06-10 14:39:56Z mikemccand $ Ie, source file name, svn revision, date, user who last committed. If for some reason we find this information compelling we could move it eg above the class javadoc into a comment? Then I think at least we'd have fewer patch problems... Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org