Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15315 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2009 22:15:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2009 22:15:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 82950 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2009 22:15:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82863 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2009 22:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82855 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2009 22:15:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:15:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of buschmic@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.183] (HELO mail-yw0-f183.google.com) (209.85.211.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:15:38 +0000 Received: by ywh13 with SMTP id 13so12974414ywh.29 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:15:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DAPZoQEMcHG4WfB3zp9weEyRiC8O/gk1myp99cJxgVI=; b=L0S2Oh24OBZ0Y16iz0qUxUvFUuddPKQG3At7XPPGaQ11CFZgd9niGCZTmuQa80BgEA GDH8+k9Iuh7njBfSnOlsrAa2BLcq65vZg4iUhCN676Av0ZGFUFIvmVAX/pFE7RVQ8K7l XzDsAlyMsQc8JHE5+opsIvZXlOs/CyRlsqTIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gr9Tp+Yoicp/HhR+InxX3SZ7CdWK3ce7AcfRZ4WHv3wSZl3f9pK6UY/p2vYFIPP+hC IHcmA3T4rDfleKBn9f8PnWPozmM+/Av6KAY3KRzbn4CjsrfmdUYXOZVuOYYqksk8xtZd WVcSBKMr4cNr286tbT4KYJw/ZLn7qY/kboGhs= Received: by 10.150.130.24 with SMTP id c24mr19217597ybd.168.1256336117425; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michael-buschs-macbook-pro-2.local (c-98-248-34-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.34.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm284067ywg.13.2009.10.23.15.15.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AE22AEE.60703@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:15:10 -0700 From: Michael Busch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.9.1 References: <9ac0c6aa0910231426v70b19cf7k466c8f856fe9fb8b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/23/09 3:00 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I try to get the rest of search deprecations away in 3.0, but then we should > be sure, that there are no more such problems like with the posIncrement in > QueryParser that need additional changes in 2.9.1 API. > > Maybe somebody can help me with the rest of LUCENE-1973, the rest is > explain() in Scorer (hard to do because lots of references to this method > even in core), then we have IndexSearcher.fieldSortDoTrackScores / > IS.fieldSortDoMaxScore (which is simple I think - I even did not know that > these settings existed) and last but not least the deprecated > MultiValueSource. The hardest one is the first. > > After that all deprecations are removed, only some small things need to be > solved like the overridesTokenStreamMethod in Analyzer (I would keep it in > 3.0, as we cannot guarantee that every analyzer reuses tokenstreams unless > we make all core/contrib analyzers final). And there are some deprecated > classes to be removed in 4.0 when the support for old indexes is gone. > > Open is still the problem with compressed fields (see LUCENE-1960), if we > use option 3 (isCompressed() deprec method, we have to add it to 2.9, too -> > I would not prefer this). > Why would we have to add the method to 2.9.1? > After that 3.0 is also almost finished, I have generics (almost) everywhere > in core, Parameter -> enum replacement, StringBuilder, varargs (not yet > finished, I have to visit method signatures and add varargs where possible). > New Number() removed by valueOf(),... Some new defaults also need to be > implemented. > > Also some final revisiting of generics should be done, there are some > strange parts with collections where it is not clearly defined what's in it. > > Thanks for all your hard work, Uwe! Michael > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:27 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: 2.9.1 >> >> OK we are now down to 0 issues!! It's been exciting :) >> >> Assuming nothing crops up over the weekend, I plan to start the >> release process on Monday. >> >> Mike >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org