Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49286 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2009 15:44:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2009 15:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20880 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 15:44:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20819 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 15:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20811 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2009 15:44:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:44:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:44:52 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68294234C1EE for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <251280728.1255275871425.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:44:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1946) Remove deprecated TokenStream API In-Reply-To: <722051150.1254641276219.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764467#action_12764467 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1946: ------------------------------------- {quote} There is one question: I removed IsoLatin1Filter. Thismay be a backwards break, so that old indexes using this filter in the analyzer need to be reindexed. But for most cases the AccentFilter would also work, but some hits may be missing when you query such an index. What should we do. Leave the deprecated analyzer in and remove it with 4.0 when all old indexes cannot be read anymore? {quote} I do not think this is a backwards break, because IsoLatin1Filter is deprecated? {noformat} * @deprecated in favor of {@link ASCIIFoldingFilter} which covers a superset * of Latin 1. This class will be removed in Lucene 3.0. {noformat} > Remove deprecated TokenStream API > --------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1946 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Components: Analysis, contrib/analyzers > Reporter: Uwe Schindler > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Fix For: 3.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1946.patch, LUCENE-1946.patch, LUCENE-1946.patch > > > I looked into clover analysis: It seems to be no longer used since I removed the tests yesterday - I am happy! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org