Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74123 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2009 04:41:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2009 04:41:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 72325 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 04:41:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 72240 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 04:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 72182 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2009 04:41:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:41:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:41:52 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3E9234C1EE for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2099155315.1254976891438.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:41:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1960) Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS In-Reply-To: <2093074763.1254960931718.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763352#action_12763352 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1960 at 10/7/09 9:40 PM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Just one question: What happens with indexes that already had compressed fields. Do they behave as before? *edit* >From the patch I see that you also removed the bitmask for testing compression in index format. So an index with compressed fields from 2.9 should behave undefined. In my opinion, support for reading compressed fields should stay available, but not for writing. And: as soon as segments are merged, they should get silently uncompressed (what should be no problem if the special FieldForMerge is no longer used). Also the constant bitmask for compression should stay "reserved" for futrure use. was (Author: thetaphi): Just one question: What happens with indexes that already had compressed fields. Do they behave as before? > Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS > -------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1960 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Michael Busch > Assignee: Michael Busch > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.0 > > Attachments: lucene-1960.patch > > > Also remove FieldForMerge and related code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org