Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21143 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2009 21:39:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2009 21:39:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24070 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2009 21:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 24000 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2009 21:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23992 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2009 21:39:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:39:52 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECAF234C1E9 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1864614148.1255901971387.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kay Kay (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5 In-Reply-To: <926927359.1207125024848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D127= 67138#action_12767138 ]=20 Kay Kay commented on LUCENE-1257: --------------------------------- {quote} I think test code rewrite is not so important now. I think first I = have to remove the rest of the deprecations and fix the test bug (see java-= dev mail). I ran the compilation with unchecked warnings turned on, only 38 warnings f= or core. I think the rest in core should be doable now JUHU! {quote} Ok - Makes sense. It would be nice to get it down to 0 soon.. > Port to Java5 > ------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Analysis, Examples, Index, Other, Query/Scoring, Que= ryParser, Search, Store, Term Vectors > Affects Versions: 3.0 > Reporter: C=C3=A9dric Champeau > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.0 > > Attachments: instantiated_fieldable.patch, java5.patch, LUCENE-12= 57-BooleanQuery.patch, LUCENE-1257-BooleanScorer_2.patch, LUCENE-1257-Buffe= redDeletes_DocumentsWriter.patch, LUCENE-1257-CheckIndex.patch, LUCENE-1257= -CompoundFileReaderWriter.patch, LUCENE-1257-ConcurrentMergeScheduler.patch= , LUCENE-1257-DirectoryReader.patch, LUCENE-1257-DisjunctionMaxQuery-more_t= ype_safety.patch, LUCENE-1257-DocFieldProcessorPerThread.patch, LUCENE-1257= -Document.patch, LUCENE-1257-IndexDeleter.patch, LUCENE-1257-IndexDeletionP= olicy_IndexFileDeleter.patch, LUCENE-1257-iw.patch, LUCENE-1257-NormalizeCh= arMap.patch, LUCENE-1257-o.a.l.util.patch, LUCENE-1257-org_apache_lucene_do= cument.patch, LUCENE-1257-org_apache_lucene_document.patch, LUCENE-1257-org= _apache_lucene_document.patch, LUCENE-1257-SegmentInfos.patch, LUCENE-1257-= StringBuffer.patch, LUCENE-1257-StringBuffer.patch, LUCENE-1257-StringBuffe= r.patch, LUCENE-1257-WordListLoader.patch, LUCENE-1257_BooleanFilter_Generi= cs.patch, LUCENE-1257_messages.patch, LUCENE-1257_o.a.l.store.patch, LUCENE= -1257_o_a_l_index_test.patch, LUCENE-1257_o_a_l_index_test.patch, LUCENE-12= 57_o_a_l_search.patch, LUCENE-1257_o_a_l_search_spans.patch, LUCENE-1257_or= g_apache_lucene_index.patch, LUCENE-1257_org_apache_lucene_index.patch, luc= ene1257surround1.patch, lucene1257surround1.patch, shinglematrixfilter_gene= rified.patch > > > For my needs I've updated Lucene so that it uses Java 5 constructs. I kno= w Java 5 migration had been planned for 2.1 someday in the past, but don't = know when it is planned now. This patch against the trunk includes : > - most obvious generics usage (there are tons of usages of sets, ... Thos= e which are commonly used have been generified) > - PriorityQueue generification > - replacement of indexed for loops with for each constructs > - removal of unnececessary unboxing > The code is to my opinion much more readable with those features (you act= ually *know* what is stored in collections reading the code, without the ne= ed to lookup for field definitions everytime) and it simplifies many algori= thms. > Note that this patch also includes an interface for the Query class. This= has been done for my company's needs for building custom Query classes whi= ch add some behaviour to the base Lucene queries. It prevents multiple unnn= ecessary casts. I know this introduction is not wanted by the team, but it = really makes our developments easier to maintain. If you don't want to use = this, replace all /Queriable/ calls with standard /Query/. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org